Problem · 01

Lift the density ceiling of your data center.

DensityOS is a timing layer for the data center you already own. It governs when work executes at the host level — no code changes, no new hardware. Productive work up. Latency and failures down.

Request POC → How it works

Throughput ↑ 43.9% Requests per second

P95 tail latency ↓ 80.5% vs. baseline

Contention failures ↓ 100% Driven by timing

Productive CPU ↑ 10% Existing hardware

Revenue impact calculator

Capacity · Annualised

Cores 10,000

Current utilisation 68%

Rate · core-hour $0.15

Current revenue —

With DensityOS · 88% —

Additional · annual —

Problem · 02

Contention limits throughput in multi-tenant infrastructure.

Four failure modes, all driven by the same root cause — competing workloads hitting the same resources at microsecond precision.

Fault · 01

Capacity sits idle for safety.

Workload collisions degrade performance. You maintain buffer capacity to prevent interference — cores you bought but cannot bill.

68% Typical util. · 32% idle

Expand

Symptom

When Customer A's workload peaks at the same moment as Customer B's, both experience slowdowns. Operations solves this by leaving 30%+ headroom — cores that generate zero revenue but prevent SLA breaches.

With DensityOS

Safe to run at 88% utilisation. DensityOS prevents timing collisions by governing when workloads execute. Same hardware, no interference, 20 points more capacity you can bill.

Fault · 02

Failures under peak load.

Resource contention causes request failures when multiple tenants hit the same resources simultaneously.

12–18% Baseline failure rate

Expand

Symptom

Three tenants hit the same memory controller at microsecond precision. One gets the resource, two wait or fail. You issue SLA credits and customers escalate.

With DensityOS

0% contention-driven failures. DensityOS staggers colliding requests by microseconds, eliminating failures at the resource level.

Fault · 03

Unpredictable performance.

Same workload delivers inconsistent results due to timing-based interference from neighbouring tenants.

76% Runtime variance

Expand

Symptom

Same job runs in 2.1 hours one time, 3.7 hours the next. The customer can't trust your SLAs or charge predictable pricing downstream.

With DensityOS

Consistent runtime, every time. DensityOS eliminates timing variance by preventing neighbour interference — same cadence, predictable performance.

Fault · 04

Power density constraints.

Simultaneous workload spikes push racks over power budgets, limiting how many nodes you can deploy per kW.

+20% Peak draw over budget

Expand

Symptom

Tenants hit CPU and memory simultaneously; power draw spikes 20% above budget. You leave physical slots empty because the power infrastructure can't handle synchronous peaks.

With DensityOS

De-synchronised execution smooths power draw. Peak stays within budget even with more nodes deployed — physical rack capacity you couldn't use before.

Approach · 03

DensityOS governs timing — not execution order.

Timing offsets at the host level de-synchronise competing requests. The workload does not change. Only when it runs changes.

Without DensityOS

Two tenants hit the same resource. One wins, one waits or fails.

15% Failure rate

With DensityOS

Microsecond timing offsets de-synchronise without changing execution order.

0% Failure rate

Host-level, not tenant-level. DensityOS injects timing delays at the infrastructure layer. No tenant code changes. No visibility into tenant data.

POC · 04

A 30-day POC on your infrastructure.

We work with a limited number of data-center operators to validate DensityOS against different infrastructure profiles. You see numbers from your fleet, not ours.

Week 01 Deploy DensityOS on your cluster — no tenant-side changes.
Weeks 01–02 Baseline measurement, then active deployment.
Week 04 Throughput, failure rate, and utilisation deltas, reported against your baseline.

Limited POC availability · 2025

Request POC →